[Orz]
Think about it carefully, if you are studying law and cannot demonstrate your professional level during the interview, you are actually at a disadvantage. This is because law is the only discipline that governs the country. If you have mastered the knowledge of this discipline but cannot apply it to analyze specific issues of national governance, it is obviously unscientific.
[Orz]
The rule of law means that any issue related to national governance can be resolved through law, and the interview tests these issues.
[Orz]
The most crucial point is that the foundation of these questions is to have you answer from the perspective of a civil servant, a service provider, and a manager, rather than limiting yourself to the general public’s understanding of these issues.
[Orz]
Analyzing interview questions involves three steps: 1. Identify key words; 2. Expand on key words; 3. Legal analysis. Any question will contain a lot of nouns and verbs, and any noun or verb has synonyms and antonyms. Using substitution, comparison, and analysis methods can easily generate many knowledge points.
[Orz]
For analysis questions, as someone who has studied law, the first step is to analyze whether the actions and facts in the question align with the concept of the rule of law. “The state stipulates that units must provide high-temperature subsidies to workers in high-temperature environments. Now, you need to investigate the situation. What do you think the difficulties are, and how would you solve them?” Key words: state, stipulation, unit, high temperature, workers, subsidy, investigation, difficulty. When asked to solve the problem, start with the state. The state implies a national scope, meaning there are no special regions, which is the premise for solving the problem; stipulation means statutory law, legal priority, must be followed, and there are consequences for violations; unit means clarifying the subject and object of compliance, thus identifying the main aspect of the contradiction, forcing the unit to comply with state regulations, relying on the three major tools (fairness, treating all enterprises equally; transparency, government information disclosure, giving all units equal access to information; justice, providing special care for those with genuine special circumstances); high temperature, defining high temperature, regulating it through law, with authorized departments providing high-temperature warnings and defining high-temperature periods, involving procedural justice, preventing abuse of power, etc.; workers, defining who qualifies as workers, legal measures if the unit does not recognize the worker’s status, and special legal protections for workers based on justice; subsidy, national and regional subsidy standards, what services and management the government needs to provide to implement subsidies, and penalties for non-compliance; the analysis of all these issues is part of the investigation and resolution process.
[Orz]
Key words + legal analysis can cover all angles without repetition, ensuring you always have something to say and leaving a good impression on the examiners.
[Orz]
The unit is organizing an information exchange meeting in another location, and you are the person in charge. How would you organize it? Key words: unit, organize, another location, information, exchange, responsible, organize. For organizational questions, it is easy to answer from a legal perspective. The unit reflects the collective will, not the personal opinions of one or two individuals, so the organizer must first clarify the legitimacy and legality of the exchange meeting, involving issues of fairness and transparency, with fair and transparent decision-making being inherent to the organization; another location (it does not say it cannot be rescheduled locally) implies logistics, procedural justice, and behavioral norms, requiring arrangements for participants’ living conditions and defining that the location must be within the scope allowed by laws and administrative regulations, using public funds reasonably, which involves a lot of legal analysis; information exchange requires the exchange parties to prepare relevant information in advance and study the legality and rationality of the exchange content and participants to avoid situations where the exchange information violates laws or policies, leading to wasted efforts; responsibility means accountability, with unified rights and responsibilities requiring the assumption of management and service duties while needing the support, understanding, and authorization of the managed and served parties, not engaging in activities beyond the supported scope or unauthorized by the unit, not neglecting duties or other obligations arising from responsibilities, and providing effective feedback to the source of rights and obligations (the unit), disclosing the fulfillment of one’s rights and obligations, and using it as a reference for future similar actions.
[Orz]
Any issue involving the government as the main body inevitably involves the rule of law. The rule of law includes legislation according to law, administration according to law, judiciary according to law, and supervision according to law. It involves various state organs and departments, with the core being the government in administration according to law, where the most easily overlooked aspect is the exercise of supervisory power over the government. The exercise of supervisory power requires transparency, fairness, and justice in administration according to law. Transparency refers to information disclosure; where there is disclosure, there is non-disclosure. The main manifestation of transparency is the publication of the basis, process, and results of any policy or fact, with all equal subjects having the right to conveniently and equally participate in activities related to disclosed information and obtain such information, which is the content of fairness. At the same time, based on justice, for important information, due to the possibility of difficulty in accessing information, special measures must be taken to ensure their right to know. Conversely, the intentional leakage of undisclosed information to certain groups leading to unfairness and illegality is prohibited. Another aspect of supervisory power is the right to request recusal.
[Orz]
“Humans are both destroyers and victims of nature. What do you think?” Humans, animals, nature, society, destruction, protection, victim, beneficiary, perspective: What distinguishes humans from animals is the consciousness of human behavior. The aggregation of this consciousness forms many basic norms, which are laws. Human destruction of nature is clearly a conscious, purposeful behavior that needs to be attributed to legal evaluation to correctly understand its legitimacy or legality. Analyze from the perspectives of legislation, judiciary, compliance, and violation. The destruction of nature should be regulated by law, and the result of this regulation may lead to humans being beneficiaries on one hand and victims on the other. Benefiting is certainly the result of the principle of legal priority and good law; being a victim is either due to issues with legal reservation, where the law is wrong, or loopholes in the rule of law, where humans do not comply with the law. The principles of transparency (laws must reach remote villages), fairness (equality in natural resource acquisition), and justice (sustainable development for future generations, survival of the animal and plant kingdoms, and human development). The rule of law runs through everything. Additionally, principles like the unity of rights and responsibilities, where development is for protection and protection is for better development; the principle of information transparency, which relates to human survival and development and the entire ecological environment, requiring broader public participation, etc., are all good entry points for answering this question from a legal perspective.